Archive for the 'Work & Family' Category

My View from Capitol Hill

Rachna Choudhry

In my job, I get  to explain the entire narrative of paid sick days to our nation’s lawmakers and their staff. It’s a rather simple task because most people intuitively get it—and often they have an experience to share.

The other day, as I walked into one of the House of Representatives office buildings, I chatted briefly with a Capitol police officer, whom I see whenever I am running in for meetings.  After we exchanged hellos, he asked me what issue I was working on.  I told him that I was working to help establish a basic standard of paid sick days so that working people aren’t forced to choose between caring for their health or their children’s health, and losing a paycheck or even their jobs.

He nodded and advised me to tell Members of Congress about a mother he met a few years earlier.  She was there to talk to Members of Congress about her son, who had died from an untreated dental abscess—a death that could have easily been prevented if the boy had access to health care and his mother had time off from work to get him the care he needed.

I’m always so touched when people share their personal stories and insights with me.  And, speaking for the hundreds of other advocates who work on this issue, we carry these stories with us.  They don’t just inform our messaging—they are the message. The reality is that nearly two in five private-sector workers (39 percent) don’t have a single paid sick day to recover from common, short-term illnesses.

In other words, for more than 40 million of us, waking up with a fever and sore throat or needing to throw up will lead to anxiety not only about our health but about our financial security. Should I go to work even though I’m sick because I need a paycheck and cannot afford to lose my job?

Without a basic workplace standard of paid sick days, two in five of us are face a terrible choice: do we respect the public’s health by staying home when sick and lose pay and risk our jobs, ordo we go to work sick so we can pay the bills and keep food on the table but risk spreading a contagious illness to others.  Swift Congressional action to pass the Healthy Families Act, which allows workers to earn up to seven paid sick days a year, would eliminate this forced choice.

This Congress has made progress on the Healthy Families Act.  Both the House and the Senate have held numerous hearings on the issue, and we have more cosponsors on the bill than ever.

But we’re not there yet. Working people want to be responsible employees and family members. They want to be conscientious community members.  The Healthy Families Act would allow workers to be all of the above. The legislation would establish a minimum labor standard that guarantees workers the ability to earn paid, job-protected time off for at least seven days a year to recover from illness or to care for a sick family member. It would ensure that working families don’t risk their financial security to do what is right for their own health and the well-being of their workplaces, schools and communities. And, it would protect the public health by allowing ill people to stay home to recover and avoid spreading illness.

Yet, there is more to be done. As we approach another flu season, as our nation’s children go back to school and as our caregiving responsibilities for older relatives expand, one thing is certain: working people need the economic security and job stability provided by a basic workplace standard of paid sick days, especially as millions continue their paycheck-to-paycheck struggles in this fractured economy.

There isn’t much time left before Congress adjourns.  We need to make sure that Members hear more stories and insights on the need for paid sick days. More than 150 women’s, workers’ and health organizations are working together to support the Healthy Families Act.  We need your help too.  Please visit www.paidsickdays.org to learn more.

What you shouldn’t have to expect when you’re expecting

Portia Wu, Vice President

Portia Wu, Vice President

Owning your own home has long been a central part of the American Dream.  It’s as American as baseball, apple pie and mom.  But according to this column in the New York Times, a lot of moms and moms-to-be are getting short shrift.

On top of their other worries, expectant mothers and women on maternity leave may face another hurdle: Being turned down for mortgages. Some lenders appear to be basing their denials on the retro belief that new moms just don’t go back to work.

It’s against the law to use gender-based stereotypes to make mortgage decisions. And, guess what else?  Their assumptions are wrong!  Here are the facts:

  •    In 6 out of 10 families, the woman is the primary breadwinner or a significant breadwinner. Because of the recession, hundreds of thousands more families with young children rely entirely on women’s wages because only mom is working. Women work—and women go back to work—because their families need their income to survive.
  • Even before the recession, four in five employed first-time moms were back at work within a year of having a child, and the majority went back within three months.   Learn more.

Here’s some good news: The Obama Administration has announced that it will investigate lenders who may be breaking the law and disqualifying women because they are pregnant or on leave. We’re glad that this Administration has jumped on the problem, and hope these investigations are only one part of its response. It seems some lenders, and others who set the standards, need some serious education so they stop penalizing pregnant women and new families!

Not only that, but we think a comprehensive effort to combat discrimination against pregnant women and new moms is long overdue.  Because while this news about mortgages is shocking, many of us just aren’t that surprised.  After all, claims of pregnancy discrimination in the workplace have been skyrocketing for years now.

New  moms get lots of advice about what to eat and what not to drink, and how to decorate the nursery and get ready for the baby.  Maybe it’s time we share some advice with employers, bankers, lenders and other institutions about how to treat pregnant women and new moms fairly!

Have you, or has someone you know, experienced problems getting a mortgage because of pregnancy or the birth of a child? Have you experienced other forms of pregnancy discrimination, at work or at school? Tell us your story, so we can share it with the Administration.

Or learn more about your rights under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act and the laws that protect women from unfair loans and credit decisions.

This Morning at the White House…

Portia Wu, Vice President

Portia Wu, Vice President

They’ll be talking about you and me, when Vice President Biden hosts an event focusing on some of the issues that matter most to women’s economic security: equal pay and work-family policies.

These issues have long been a top priority for working women, and now we finally have an Administration that’s making them a priority, too.

The National Partnership will be there to hear first-hand about the work of the President’s Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force, which is defending our right to fair pay. We’ll learn about the Administration’s new plan for a nationwide conversation to improve work-family balance for all Americans – and we’ll share that information with you.

With more women in the workforce than ever, our caregiving responsibilities growing, and families relying on women’s wages more than ever, it’s about time.

We’ll report back on this blog after the event. To join it virtually, tune in today at 10:45 a.m. to http://www.whitehouse.gov/live.

New Survey: People Need, Want Paid Sick Days

Debra Ness

Debra Ness

Do you worry about losing your job when you get sick? If you’re like 40 million other workers in this country, perhaps you should!

In a new survey conducted by the University of Chicago’s National Opinion Research Center, commissioned by the Public Welfare Foundation, one in six people report that they have lost a job for taking time off from work to care for a sick child or family member, or to cope with their own illness.

But it doesn’t stop there. The survey findings also suggest that the lack of paid sick days is harming public health, and straining the nation’s health care system. It makes perfect sense: Without paid sick days, more people to go to work sick, multiplying their chance of infecting others.  People without paid sick days can’t take time off from work to go to the doctor – and according to the new survey, they are then twice as likely as people with paid sick days to use an emergency room.

Government data show that nearly 40 percent of workers in this country do not have paid sick days.  Even more don’t have paid time off to care for a sick child or family member.  In light of the public health risk and economic insecurity caused by the lack of paid sick days, it isn’t surprising that across all demographic groups, the public says paid sick days are a basic worker’s right. The public favors a law that guarantees paid sick days for all workers. In fact, a whopping 86% of respondents would back a plan providing workers up to seven paid sick days per year.

San Francisco and Washington, D.C. have paid sick day laws in place, and voters in Milwaukee passed a paid sick days measure.  There is strong support in the New York City Council for the citywide paid sick days law now under consideration.  More than 20 states saw the introduction of paid sick days bills in the 2009-2010 legislative sessions, and as many as 24 states and localities are expected to see the same next year.  Congress is considering the Healthy Families Act, which would allow workers at businesses with 15 or more employees to earn up to seven paid sick days annually. By all appearances, one would think the tide is turning – but we aren’t nearly there yet.

The survey relays a clear message from the public: No one should have to make the impossible choice between their job and their own health or the health of their loved ones. Now more than ever, workers need paid sick days.

This Fathers’ Day, Congress Should Show that it Remembers Dads and Moms Too

Portia Wu, Vice President

Portia Wu, Vice President

On Sunday, people around the country will be finding a way to show our fathers what an important role they play in our lives. So it’s ironic that this week Congress missed a chance to show the American people that it understands that dads—and moms, too—deserve policies to help them meet work and family needs. This opportunity came when the Work-Life Balance Award Act was considered under the suspension of the rules (which requires at least a two-thirds vote for passage).  This bill was supported by advocacy groups as well as business groups. Unfortunately, although some sensible Republicans crossed the aisle to support the legislation, the Republican Study Committee encouraged its members to vote “no” and the legislation failed in a 249 to 163 vote.

The need for policies that help workers meet their obligations on the job and at home is very much on the minds of all of us these days. We’re glad to see that this conversation is happening at the very highest levels: this past Spring, some of our nation’s highest profile parents, the President and First Lady Michelle Obama, called together advocates, businesses and experts to talk about the need for flexible workplace policies. The Work-Life Balance Award Act, championed by Rep. Lynn Woolsey and Rep. George Miller, would have been another important step in furthering the conversation. The bill would simply have allowed public recognition for model employers with good family-friendly policies.  Such recognition, we hoped, would spur other companies to follow their example.

The failure of this straightforward bill may be in part the result of partisan posturing, but it’s unfortunate that many of our nation’s lawmakers are making light of the colossal shifts in America’s workplaces and the vital role work-family policies play in Americans’ economic well-being. In a time when most families have two parents at work, and where many families are living paycheck to paycheck, policies like paid sick days and paid family leave, which allow workers to meet their family responsibilities without risking jobs or pay, are more important than ever. This modest bill wouldn’t have delivered those things, but it would have at least recognized employers who understand these needs and have already adopted policies to help their workers meet these challenges.

As work-and-family advocates, we supported the Work-Life Balance Award Act and the chance it provided to demonstrate the importance of strong workplace policies. It is too bad that Congress rejected this opportunity. Going forward, we hope that every Member of Congress will put working families before partisan politics.  It is past time for workplace laws to honor workers’ commitments, both at home and at work.

New Moms Benefit from Health Reform

Portia Wu, Vice President

Portia Wu, Vice President

“Can’t you just use the bathroom?”

There’s a question that tens of thousands of new moms won’t have to hear anymore, thanks to the new health reform law which includes an important provision guaranteeing many nursing moms the right to take breaks to express milk at work.

Study after study shows that breast-feeding can help lead to healthy outcomes for women and children, and save billions in health costs. But many women have to stop breast-feeding – or never even start – because they can’t pump milk in their workplaces.  Some new moms have found their employers to be outright hostile, while others simply face work environments that offer nowhere private or sanitary to go.

The pressures and conflicts this creates for new moms are worsened because many have to return to work very quickly after giving birth.  Most workers in this country have no paid family leave, or others cannot afford to take the unpaid, job-protected leave the Family and Medical Leave Act provides – or aren’t covered by that law.

And in this tough economy, families are more reliant than ever on working moms’ incomes.

Until a few weeks ago, only half the states had any protections for nursing moms who worked, which meant that women were left to fend for themselves.  But Senator Jeff Merkley (OR) championed this issue in health care reform, with support from Rep. Carolyn Maloney (NY) and others.  And now, for the first time, there’s a federal standard to help breast-feeding mothers pump at work.

Employers have to provide covered workers reasonable break time to express milk for up to one year after a child’s birth.  They must provide “a place, other than a bathroom, that is shielded from view and free from intrusion from co-workers and the public.”

This new law is an important step in making sure our workplaces meet the needs of working women. It provides protections to those who need it most – hourly workers including those who work in retail, factories, restaurants, and call centers, who often have the most difficult time taking needed breaks and finding clean, safe spaces to pump.

To learn more about this new law, click here.  To thank Senator Merkley and encourage him to take further steps to help working women, click here.

A First Family That Puts Families First!

Portia Wu, Vice President

Portia Wu, Vice President

At night after the kids are in bed, most working couples have “kitchen table” talks.  Who’s going to meet with a teacher, or stay home with a sick child? Who can take mom to the doctor on Friday?  Which bills can we pay this week?

Today, the National Partnership was honored to be invited to the table for a discussion led by the First Family, on work-family issues.

First Lady Michelle Obama kicked off the White House Forum on Workplace Flexibility on Wednesday with powerful remarks that made it clear that she knows just what it means to be a frazzled working parent. It’s great to know that work-family challenges are something that she and the President have experienced first hand, and that they know we need national solutions.photo.blog.obama.family

In fact, she talked about how terrible it is that many people don’t even have a single paid sick day—and that’s why the Administration supports the Healthy Families Act! That’s a key priority for the National Partnership too, and we’re leading a broad-based coalition that’s working for passage.

In these tough economic times, it was also great to hear strong endorsements for greater workplace flexibility from other Administration leaders, including Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis and Christina Romer, Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers. And the Council of Economic Advisers released a report today that makes the economic case for workplace flexibility, including paid leave.

We had the chance to break into discussion groups, made up of advocates, labor and business leaders, researchers and workers. My group had a lively debate. It’s clear that, while we might take different approaches, we all agree that we need to change our country and our workplace culture.

The day was capped by closing remarks from President Obama in which he stressed that workplace flexibility can’t be an optional perk. It needs to be an integral part of our workplace policies. He repeated his commitment to help families facing a daily juggling act, and repeated his support for family friendly policies, including state paid leave programs. And he promised that the federal government will lead by example.

At the National Partnership, we’re thrilled that President Obama and so many high-level leaders in his Administration are focusing on these issues. This is what working families need!  But discussion is just the first step.

Working families need action. That means paid sick days, paid family and medical leave, better child and elder care, expanding the Family and Medical Leave Act, and advancing other programs and polices that can make our workplaces more flexible.

So help us advance these and other critical policies. Take action now! Join the First Family in speaking out for the workplace flexibility and work-family policies that America’s families need!

Next Up: Paid Sick Days for 30 Million Workers

Rachna Choudhry

Rachna Choudhry

It’s hard to believe, but the sick truth is tens of millions of workers in the good ole U. S. of A. don’t have a single paid sick day.

We’re working hard to change this, and yesterday we co-hosted a standing-room-only briefing on Capitol Hill for congressional staff and advocates about the need for a paid-sick-days standard to promote economic security among working families.

Healthy Families Act Briefing March 2010

Healthy Families Act Briefing, March 2010

We planned for 40 people and more than 75 showed up!  The big crowd was a clear indication of strong congressional interest in this issue.

Gail Cohen of the Joint Economic Committee presented new research on the Healthy Families Act, legislation that would establish a basic workplace standard of seven paid sick days.  The Joint Economic Committee found that the legislation would give more than 30 million more workers access to paid sick time.

The Healthy Families Act would significantly expand access to this basic protection for millions of our nation’s most vulnerable workers, including low-wage workers, workers of color and women workers.  Nearly half of workers who would gain access to paid sick time if the legislation passes earn less than $10.63/hour, placing them in the lowest wage quartile.  Workers of color comprise nearly one-third of the workers who would be able to accrue paid sick time under the Healthy Families Act, including nearly four million additional African American workers and 5.6 million additional Latino workers.  Nearly half of workers who would gain access to paid sick days—13 million—are women.

Thanks to our partner organization, CLASP, Working Mother Media’s Jennifer Owens spoke at the event, discussing her company’s support for the Healthy Families Act.  An expert on best practices, Owens said that nearly nine in ten employers on Working Mother Magazine’s 100 Best Companies list offer paid sick time to their employees.

Jennifer also noted that Working Mother supports the Healthy Families Act as an employer with its own staff.  “We advocate for it because it fits snugly with our mission to celebrate the companies that support working families, both at work and home.”  She explained that her company hates “presenteeism,” when a staff member comes to work sick, infecting the whole office, school, housekeeping staff or restaurant.

Now more than ever—when families are struggling and jobs are scarce—workers need paid sick days.  The March 2 briefing confirmed what workers and responsible employers already know: when companies respond to the needs of working families, workers are committed and productive, and our communities, workplaces and schools stay healthy.

FMLA: After 17 Years, It’s Time to Take the Next Step

Vicki Shabo, Director of Work and Family Programs

Vicki Shabo, Director of Work and Family Programs

The Family and Medical Leave Act turns 17 today.

At the National Partnership, we are like proud parents. We remember the long fight to pass it, and the moment on February 5, 1993 when we stood beside President Clinton as he made it the very first bill he signed. For the first time, we had a national law to address the challenges facing workers who struggle to meet their job and family commitments.

The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) was a huge step. It meant that millions of workers could take unpaid, but job-protected, leave to recover from illness or care for a sick family member or bond with a new baby or new foster or adopted child. It meant fewer workers had to make impossible choices when illness struck or babies came.

But it was intended as a first step in a national commitment to ensuring that workers are able to meet their responsibilities to their families as well as their employers.

We’ve yet to take the next one.

To be fair, we’ve made some progress. In the last two years, certain new categories of workers — members of the military, military families, and flight crews — gained FMLA protection.

But on the 17th birthday of the FMLA, when seven in ten working families with children have all adults in the labor force, one in four workers have elder-care responsibilities, and the average couple in this country works close to 90 hours a week combined, we need swift, concerted action to help workers meet their work and family obligations.

Fortunately, there are signs that the federal government is moving in the right direction. The President’s proposed fiscal year 2011 budget and the Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) 2011 strategic priorities recognize the demands on families and working caregivers.

Here’s what we’d like to see:

Paid Family and Medical Leave. The biggest barrier to taking family and medical leave is the inability to forgo a paycheck. Two states — California and New Jersey — have paid family leave insurance programs up and running. Washington State approved a program in 2007 but has yet to implement it for lack of start-up funds; other states have been slow to follow suit for the same reason. But there is good news. Just this week, President Obama proposed a FY2011 budget with a State Paid Leave Grant program, which would set aside $50 million for states that implement their own paid leave programs. This funding would be a critical first step to expand access to paid family leave. Congressional proposals to develop a national family leave insurance system or to provide significantly more in start-up funding for state paid leave programs would do even more.

FMLA Expansion. Affordability aside, not all workers or workplaces are covered by the FMLA, which doesn’t extend to particular types of leave that workers commonly need. Bills now before Congress would extend FMLA access to people who work for smaller companies and to employees who worked only part time during the prior year, which would expand the law’s protection to more low-wage workers. Other proposed legislation would extend FMLA leave to grandparents, grandchildren, and domestic partners or same sex spouses; to domestic violence and sexual assault victims; and to parents who need to attend routine medical appointments or parent-teacher conferences.

FMLA Restoration. The Bush Administration put regulations in place that make it harder for workers to take the leave the FMLA provides. The Department of Labor has yet to revise or reverse those regulations. Fixing these regulations is straightforward and should be a priority.

Current, Comprehensive, and Routinely Collected Data. The government last collected comprehensive FMLA data in 2000 – a full decade ago. The lack of recent data makes it impossible to know either how the FMLA serves workers or how to fails to serve their needs. The President’s proposed budget includes a small increase in funding for DOL to investigate the feasibility of collecting data on work-family “balance” issues. In addition to adding a standard series of questions about family leave-taking and caregiving to ongoing government surveys, policymakers and advocates need updated, comprehensive data to so that public policies can better reflect caregivers’ needs.

To ensure that workers are able to fulfill their commitments at home and at work while maintaining their family’s economic security, give the FMLA a birthday present and take action now.

Pregnancy Discrimination On Wisteria Lane!

Desperate Housewives

Desperate Housewives

If you haven’t seen the latest episodes of Desperate Housewives, you have missed more than just the usual melodrama swirling around the residents of Wisteria Lane. A new storyline may be all-too-familiar to many viewers — a woman facing pregnancy discrimination on the job.

Lynnette, a working wife, mother of four, and “desperate housewife” chose not to reveal her pregnancy to Carlos, her boss and longtime friend and neighbor. When Lynnette received a promotion over a coworker who was pregnant, it became clear to her that she would be discriminated against as well if Carlos found out about her pregnancy.

Her fears were confirmed in a recent episode. Once Carlos discovered that Lynnette was pregnant, she was quickly fired. Although Carlos claimed that she was fired because she refused to take a promotion and relocate, it was clear to her — and to the audience — that the real reason was her pregnancy. Can this happen in real life, or is it just another outlandish plot?

Statistics show that the Desperate Housewives pregnancy discrimination storyline is neither exaggerated nor rare. In 2008, pregnancy discrimination charges rose to their highest level in the history of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which saw an almost 13 percent increase in claims over the previous year. And the most recent increase is part of a trend; since 1992, pregnancy discrimination charges to the EEOC and its companion agencies have skyrocketed by 86 percent. Read about the increase here.

Some cases rival the drama on Wisteria Lane. In 2004, the Department of Justice joined a lawsuit against the Washington D.C. Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, claiming that women in training for the program were required to take pregnancy tests and told that they could lose their jobs if they became pregnant. As a result, two women said they chose to terminate their pregnancies for fear of losing their jobs. The complaint the U.S. Department of Justice filed against the employer is here. The case was eventually settled and the women received $100,000 each.

In 2007, the EEOC settled a case of pregnancy discrimination for $350,000 against Mothers Ware Inc., which sells maternity clothes. According to the EEOC, the store refused to hire pregnant women and discriminated against a supervisor who complained about the policy. Read the EEOC’s press release about the case here.

In August, the EEOC brought a pregnancy discrimination suit against a New Jersey trucking company, Decker Transport. According to the EEOC, when one of the women working at Decker informed her boss she was pregnant, she was immediately put on leave and told she should not come back until she got “rid of the problem.” When she refused, she was fired.

Those are women who spoke up and complained. Many more may be afraid to do so, or may not even know that discrimination against pregnant women is illegal.
Find out more about your rights here.

Given the economic crisis, it is especially important that women have secure employment. For those outside of Wisteria Lane, pregnancy discrimination truly can create a desperate situation. Not only does it cause emotional suffering, but it also threatens the economic security of working families who rely on women’s income.

Learn more about the Pregnancy Discrimination Act and what protections it provides.