Although not part of this discussion isn’t anyone else worried about the fact that the left is only offended that there are “no exceptions” to proposed abortion rules/laws? If these laws pass with ONLY the exception of rape and incest we’ll then go back to the days where the burden of proof is on the victim and we then revert back to vilifying the victims. Because, of course, she asked for it.

Please don’t call them pro-lifers, call them anti-choicers. If they were pro-life the pregnant women would have as much value as the “innocent fetus”.

Right now in Kentucky, the legislators are trying to force the ACT college testing people to accept their students who do not know about evolution as a result of their creationism teachings. Biology cannot exist as a science without evolution. So, their answer is to attack the gatekeepers and change the rules to make the world safe for creationism.

They seem desperate to insulate all children from known and accepted science. In Missouri where I live, the primary elections included a constitutional amendment allowing for “school prayer”. Now, students can opt out of science if their parents are “offended” by the science teachings, and my children will have to hear about “intelligent design” in a setting that’s supposed to be serious. I wonder how long this one will last once the classroom fights begin and our test scores fall through the floor…. sigh.

Attention Conservatives: The science behind your smartphones and computers and military equipment and spy satellites and drones and smart bombs works on THE SAME PRINCIPLES and uses the SAME SCIENTIFIC METHODS AND SYSTEMS that underpin evolution and is just as correct. Same for climate science. You don’t get to decide which science branches you agree with. You either prove it wrong with peer-reviewed research, or you shut up.

While I may not like abortion and I honestly don’t think anyone of either gender particularity likes it or that every woman wants to have to have the procedure. But, it is nevertheless, the choice to be made by the woman based on her own thinking. But as you noted, when we allow junk science to be twisted many times over as to exhibit some future negative causal effect to a woman’s health, as particulars coming from abortion procedures, then pro-lifer morals get totally lost on lies that completely gut the meaning of what being “moral” is.

I am all for free speech and to everyone having their opinions. It is perfectly fine for those who are staunchly pro-life, to state their case as to why they think abortion is wrong. But don’t take real science down on a path of lies to farther an agenda that has no bearing on that of the actual physical health of a woman; doing that just simply makes their pro-life stance a complete lie.