http://blog.nationalpartnership.org/index.php/2011/11/keep-medicaid-safe/ Just another WordPress weblog Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:54:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://blog.nationalpartnership.org/index.php/2011/11/keep-medicaid-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-26965 Carl Paul Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:22:45 +0000 http://blog.nationalpartnership.org/?p=1304#comment-26965 Imagine in the future that the government required every women to be inoculated from a virus or disease only later to find out that the inoculation had terrible consequences that were unknown at the time. Good intentions can have bad consequences and there-in lies the danger of subordinating your individual right to choose base on your conscience. ObamaCare is ripe for this kind of abuse called Tyranny. Imagine in the future that the government required every women to be inoculated from a virus or disease only later to find out that the inoculation had terrible consequences that were unknown at the time. Good intentions can have bad consequences and there-in lies the danger of subordinating your individual right to choose base on your conscience. ObamaCare is ripe for this kind of abuse called Tyranny.

]]> http://blog.nationalpartnership.org/index.php/2011/11/keep-medicaid-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-26964 Carl Paul Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:55:35 +0000 http://blog.nationalpartnership.org/?p=1304#comment-26964 I just heard you speak on cSpan regarding the affordable healthcare act and contraception. My questions are simply. 1. What give the Federal Government the right to dictate/mandate that a religious institution dispense something that is against their moral conscience? 2. Why should I have to pay for the consequences of your ( women in general ) sexual escapades out of wedlock? Isn't contraception readily available at the store not to mention free abstinence? The answers are simple. 1. There is no constitutional basis for mandating an individual to privately contract with another simply because that person exist. None. It will be overturned without question and furthermore, Religious freedom the real issue which far outweighs any concern over governmental management of reproduction or anything else within the bounds of individual freedoms. I urge you to rise above this singular issue and view it from a constitutional point of view and this administration's infringement on the sovereignty of the individual to choose for themselves by their owen conscience. I just heard you speak on cSpan regarding the affordable healthcare act and contraception. My questions are simply. 1. What give the Federal Government the right to dictate/mandate that a religious institution dispense something that is against their moral conscience? 2. Why should I have to pay for the consequences of your ( women in general ) sexual escapades out of wedlock? Isn’t contraception readily available at the store not to mention free abstinence? The answers are simple. 1. There is no constitutional basis for mandating an individual to privately contract with another simply because that person exist. None. It will be overturned without question and furthermore, Religious freedom the real issue which far outweighs any concern over governmental management of reproduction or anything else within the bounds of individual freedoms. I urge you to rise above this singular issue and view it from a constitutional point of view and this administration’s infringement on the sovereignty of the individual to choose for themselves by their owen conscience.

]]>