Pregnancy Discrimination On Wisteria Lane!

Desperate Housewives

Desperate Housewives

If you haven’t seen the latest episodes of Desperate Housewives, you have missed more than just the usual melodrama swirling around the residents of Wisteria Lane. A new storyline may be all-too-familiar to many viewers — a woman facing pregnancy discrimination on the job.

Lynnette, a working wife, mother of four, and “desperate housewife” chose not to reveal her pregnancy to Carlos, her boss and longtime friend and neighbor. When Lynnette received a promotion over a coworker who was pregnant, it became clear to her that she would be discriminated against as well if Carlos found out about her pregnancy.

Her fears were confirmed in a recent episode. Once Carlos discovered that Lynnette was pregnant, she was quickly fired. Although Carlos claimed that she was fired because she refused to take a promotion and relocate, it was clear to her — and to the audience — that the real reason was her pregnancy. Can this happen in real life, or is it just another outlandish plot?

Statistics show that the Desperate Housewives pregnancy discrimination storyline is neither exaggerated nor rare. In 2008, pregnancy discrimination charges rose to their highest level in the history of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which saw an almost 13 percent increase in claims over the previous year. And the most recent increase is part of a trend; since 1992, pregnancy discrimination charges to the EEOC and its companion agencies have skyrocketed by 86 percent. Read about the increase here.

Some cases rival the drama on Wisteria Lane. In 2004, the Department of Justice joined a lawsuit against the Washington D.C. Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, claiming that women in training for the program were required to take pregnancy tests and told that they could lose their jobs if they became pregnant. As a result, two women said they chose to terminate their pregnancies for fear of losing their jobs. The complaint the U.S. Department of Justice filed against the employer is here. The case was eventually settled and the women received $100,000 each.

In 2007, the EEOC settled a case of pregnancy discrimination for $350,000 against Mothers Ware Inc., which sells maternity clothes. According to the EEOC, the store refused to hire pregnant women and discriminated against a supervisor who complained about the policy. Read the EEOC’s press release about the case here.

In August, the EEOC brought a pregnancy discrimination suit against a New Jersey trucking company, Decker Transport. According to the EEOC, when one of the women working at Decker informed her boss she was pregnant, she was immediately put on leave and told she should not come back until she got “rid of the problem.” When she refused, she was fired.

Those are women who spoke up and complained. Many more may be afraid to do so, or may not even know that discrimination against pregnant women is illegal.
Find out more about your rights here.

Given the economic crisis, it is especially important that women have secure employment. For those outside of Wisteria Lane, pregnancy discrimination truly can create a desperate situation. Not only does it cause emotional suffering, but it also threatens the economic security of working families who rely on women’s income.

Learn more about the Pregnancy Discrimination Act and what protections it provides.

1 Responses to “Pregnancy Discrimination On Wisteria Lane!”


  • I lost my job twenty years ago because I was pregnant. I’d been working about a year on a long-term contract as a technical writer for a Fortune 500 company. As a contract worker I did not have the same rights as an employee so my supervisor was very up front about the reasons for my dismissal. She told me that the rest of the project team leaders just didn’t think I’d be able to “deliver the product” by the deadline — which was in the same month as my baby delivery. She explained that even though my work was excellent, the project was too important to risk and they had to have a technical writer they could “depend upon.”

    So I found myself out of work just when I needed it the most.

    But three months later I got a very interesting phone call. Turns out they were unable to find another writer with my technical qualifications and in desperation they outsourced everything I’d been doing to a professional writing company. The new company, upon learning about me, simply called me and asked it I’d like to come work for them doing the same job I was doing before, but for a 30% raise!

    This new media company was made up of of a small group of women who had founded their business model on the idea that people have lives outside of work and a good employee can usually work around personal obstacles if given the proper supports. The woman who offered me the job just laughed when I asked her if she was concerned about my pregnancy interfering with work. She said “We’ve got another pregnant woman as well as a man whose wife is pregnant, plus a woman going through menopause, several parents of young children, a guy recovering from a heart bypass, and a newly engaged 20-something who spends every waking moment preparing for her upcoming wedding — don’t worry, you’ll fit right in!”

    I was able to complete my work on time AND have a beautiful baby girl. But the original corporation ended up paying twice as much for my work just because they were afraid of a pregnancy.

Leave a Reply